The New Omega Moon Watch

Omega takes us to the Dark Side with their new moonwatch

 John Biggs,TechCrunch Wed, Mar 21 11:38 AM PDT

Elon’s Mars Rocket Could Fly By 2019

Style

Elon Musk at SXSW: Mars Spaceship Will Be Ready for First Flights by 2019

 Aristos Georgiou,Newsweek 5 hours ago

NASA Nears Testing Fission Reactor For Missions To Moon, Mars

NASA nears testing on fission reactor for missions to Moon, Mars

The notion that NASA is currently developing a nuclear power system might not seem that Earth shattering. The agency has flown a number of missions powered by radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) since 1965, such as on board the two Viking Mars landers, the Curiosity rover, the Apollo expeditions to the Moon, the two Voyager spacecraft, the New Horizons probe to Pluto, and the just-concluded Cassini mission to Saturn. But this time, with the Kilopower Project, NASA aims to shake things up on the surface of other planets.

RTGs produce thermoelectricity via the Seebeck effect—using the natural decay of a radioisotope heat source (typically Plutonium-238) to heat wires made from different types of metal, each shifting electron energy at different times, creating a current. This time, NASA is aiming for a fission nuclear power system that would enable long-duration stays on planetary surfaces.

Beyond solar technology, there is currently no off-the-shelf solution for powering long-term human missions to Mars. The Kilopower project is a near-term technology effort to develop preliminary concepts and technologies for an affordable fission power system that could provide safe, efficient, and plentiful energy for future robotic and human space exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and other destinations.

While NASA uses solar power extensively to power spacecraft, satellites, and rovers, fission reactors can provide energy even in dark environments where solar cells cannot collect enough light. On Mars, the sun’s power varies widely throughout the seasons, and periodic dust storms can last for months. On the Moon, lunar nights can last for 14 days.

As planned, the Kilowatt reactor technology is intended to provide up to 10 kW of electrical power continuously for at least 10 years—approximately 10 times as much power than the multi-mission RTG used on Curiosity. Four Kilopower units producing a continuous 40 kW would provide enough power to establish an outpost. However, the technology is scalable down to 1 kW of power—which could provide modular energy sources for easier transportation and deployment during human exploration missions.

“We want a power source that can handle extreme environments,” said Lee Mason, NASA’s principal technologist for power and energy storage. “Kilopower opens up the full surface of Mars, including the northern latitudes where water may reside. On the Moon, Kilopower could be deployed to help search for resources in permanently shadowed craters.”

The reactor design includes a novel integration of readily available Uranium-235 (U-235) fuel that could enable further Planetary Science Decadal Surveys without relying on limited Plutonium-238 dioxide fuel. As designed, the reactor, dubbed “KRUSTY” (Kilopower Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY), uses a single rod of boron carbide to initiate the reaction. Passive sodium heat pipes, provided by Pennsylvania-based Advanced Cooling Technologies, transfer reactor heat to high-efficiency Stirling converters, supplied by Ohio-based Sunpower, Inc. An umbrella-like titanium radiator is used to cool the converters.

A beryllium oxide reflector surrounds the 6-in diameter uranium core and creates enough neutron reflection for the reactor to heat and go critical—or where a nuclear chain reaction is self-sustaining, with no increase or decrease in power or temperature. According to NASA, the reactor uses well-established nuclear physics to self-regulate the fission reactions and this feature eliminates the need for a complicated control system.

The Stirling converters use heat to create pressure forces that move a piston, which is coupled to an alternator to produce electricity. The components, even in the test setups, were either designed to be flight-like or flight-ready to ground test at near-flight conditions (i.e., vacuum environment, full thermal power and operating temperature, realistic configuration, and interfaces).

The Kilopower project is part of the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Game Changing Development (GCD) program, which is managed by the NASA Langley Research Center. While NASA has attempted many space reactor programs since the 1970s, previous programs were limited by funding, schedule, and then-current technologies. The three-year, $20 million Kilopower project, which began in 2015, leverages significant technological breakthroughs from NASA research of the last decade, namely a 2012 proof-of-concept test involving Flattop, a monolithic-core fission reactor that incorporated a heat pipe and Stirling converter at the Nevada National Security Site’s (NNSS’s) National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC).

“The 2012 experiment used an existing nuclear criticality device called Flattop to produce 24 W of electricity. It also confirmed the basics of the nuclear reactor physics and the heat transfer principles necessary to operate this kind of reactor in deep space. KRUSTY will expand on the 2012 experiment by testing a flight-like reactor core at full operating temperature,” said Mark Martinez, President of Mission Support and Test Services, LLC, which manages the NNSS.

The Kilopower project has been managed by the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) with partnership from the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, the Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), and several DOE laboratories, including Los Alamos National Laboratory, Y-12 National Security Complex, and NNSS.

After conducting numerous system tests with a depleted uranium core, GRC shipped the prototype power system from Cleveland to NNSS in late September 2017. The team at the NNSS National Critical Experiments Research Center began tests on the reactor core in November 2017 and connected the power system to the solid, cast, highly-enriched U-235 core (provided by Y-12) and initiated end-to-end checkouts this past January. According to project officials, the experiments should conclude with a 28-hour, full-power steady-state test (800 °C) in late March.

“The upcoming Nevada testing will answer a lot of technical questions to prove out the feasibility of this technology, with the goal of moving it to a technology readiness level of 5 (TRL 5). It’s a breadboard test in a vacuum environment, operating the equipment at the relevant conditions,” according to lead researcher Marc Gibson.

The next step would be qualifying the Kilopower system in a relevant environment, such as space.

The entire operation is being conducted as if the test was a flight test, with thorough analytical modeling, integrated nuclear test operations, ground safety measures, and interagency support. The only key items missing from the test are the radiator, full suite of Stirling converters, startup-rod, zero gravity environment, launch approval, flight hardware, flight qualification, and spacecraft integration.

NASA has gone through lengths to ensure that all present and future tests comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes. Beyond needing to complete a final NEPA review before a flight test, several operational safety concerns must be addressed. At launch, the radiological hazard must be limited to less than 5 Ci (the amount of naturally occurring radioactivity of the U-235 core). The reactor, which would not be in operation until reaching the surface of a planet or being placed on a trajectory leaving Earth, will require sufficient radiation shielding to protect crew and sensitive flight equipment. Furthermore, the reactor design includes inherent fault tolerance, so any loss of cooling or failure of one of the heat pipes of Stirling converters would trigger an automatic reduction in fission power, preventing uncontrolled reactions.

Throughout the project, researchers have referred to the technology as an agnostic power system; and have outlined many potential planetary applications such as nuclear electric propulsion for orbiters and landers on Europa, Titan, Enceladus, Neptune, and Pluto; commercial space applications such as space power utility (pay-for-service), resource mining, and settlement; and terrestrial adaptations for powering military forward operating bases, unmanned vehicles, material processing, manufacturing, and electric propulsion.

“The reactor technology we are testing could be applicable to multiple NASA missions, and we ultimately hope that this is the first step for fission reactors to create a new paradigm of truly ambitious and inspiring space exploration,” said David Poston, chief reactor designer at Los Alamos. “Simplicity is essential to any first-of-a-kind engineering project—not necessarily the simplest design, but finding the simplest path through design, development, fabrication, safety and testing.”

Robert Zubrin: A Purpose-Driven Space Program

MARS SOCIETY ANNOUNCEMENT
View this email in your browser

A Purpose-Driven Space Program?
By Dr. Robert Zubrin, National Review, 03.02.18

On February 12th the Trump administration revealed its proposed budget for NASA. While the $19 billion in total funding provided was not much different from the levels approved by the Obama and Bush administrations, the new plan did manage to increase the incoherence in space-agency thinking to truly remarkable levels.

Particularly outstanding examples of illogic were the administration’s decisions to cancel the Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) while proceeding with a lunar-orbiting space station dubbed Deep Space Gateway.

WFIRST is a 2.4-meter space telescope with capabilities superior to Hubble, made possible on a bargain budget of $3 billion by the donation to NASA of a surplus spy satellite by the National Reconnaissance Office. It promises breakthrough discoveries of exoplanets and could potentially reveal the truth about the nature of the dark energy that is driving the expansion of the universe, and numerous other questions in astrophysics. It has been approved and strongly backed as a top priority by every scientific review committee advising the government.

Deep Space Gateway (recently renamed Lunar Orbital Platform–Gateway), on the other hand, is a boondoggle that will cost several tens of billions of dollars at the least and serve no useful purpose. We do not need a lunar-orbiting station to go to the Moon, or to Mars, or to near-Earth asteroids. We do not need it to go anywhere.

There is nothing worth doing in lunar orbit, nothing to use, and nothing to explore. It is true that one could operate rovers on the lunar surface from orbit, but the argument that it is worth the expense of such a station in order to eliminate the two-second time delay involved in controlling them from Earth is absurd. We are on the verge of having self-driving cars on Earth that can handle traffic conditions in New York City and Los Angeles. There’s a lot less traffic on the Moon.

Yet the problem with Deep Space Gateway is much bigger than the waste of decades of time and tens of billions of dollars. The deeper problem is the form of thinking it represents.

NASA’s astronomy and robotic planetary-exploration programs have achieved epic accomplishments because they are purpose-driven. In contrast, since the end of Apollo, NASA’s human-spaceflight program has been purpose-free. As a result, its accomplishments have been negligible.

If the goal is to build a Moon base, it should be built on the surface of the Moon. That is where the science is, that is where the shielding material is, and that is where the resources to make propellant and other useful things are to be found. The best place to build it would be at one of the poles, because there are spots at both of the Moon’s poles where sunlight is accessible all the time, as well as permanently shadowed craters nearby where water ice has accumulated. Such ice could be electrolyzed to make hydrogen-oxygen rocket propellant, to fuel Earth-return vehicles as well as ballistic hoppers that would provide the base’s crew with exploratory access to most of the rest of the Moon.

The Trump administration says that it wants to return to the Moon, but its actions are not consistent with that goal. In addition to the nonsensical lunar-orbiting project, its budget projects spending $7.5 billion over the next three years on preparing the Space Launch System (SLS) for its first flight, when we already have SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy, which can lift 70 percent of the SLS payload at one-tenth the cost. The same funds, if spent on developing landers and ascent vehicles, could enable a return to the Moon within four years and human missions to Mars in eight.

The situation is truly ironic. With the success of Falcon Heavy, America could be poised right now for a breakthrough into space. The cash available is adequate. What is lacking is intelligent direction. We will never get to Mars if we allow our human-spaceflight program to be run as a random walk.

NASA didn’t get to the Moon by fishing around for things to do with stuff created by a haphazard set of constituency-supported programs. It got there by a embracing a clear purpose and acting accordingly.

Instead of wrecking NASA’s healthy purpose-driven science efforts, the Trump administration should be focusing on providing comparable rational guidance for a human-spaceflight program that remains scandalously adrift.

Dr. Robert Zubrin is the President of Pioneer Astronautics and Founder & President of the Mars Society.

A full discussion of the future of NASA and the human space flight program will be held during the 21st Annual International Mars Society Convention (Aug. 23-26, Pasadena, CA). To register for the Mars Society convention, please click here.

Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
Website
Website
YouTube
YouTube
Share
Tweet
The Mars Society
11111 West 8th Avenue, unit A
Lakewood, CO 80215 U.S.A.
www.marssociety.org
https://www.facebook.com/TheMarsSociety
@TheMarsSociety

Copyright (c) 2018 The Mars Society
All rights reserved.