When Space Screams

When Space Screams

The slogan of the original “Alien” movie read, “In space, no one can hear you scream.”

While sound cannot conventionally travel in space – unlike on Earth – there is a scary cacophony coming from a supermassive black hole located about 250 million light-years away from Earth, Newsweek reported.

NASA researchers recently released a 34-second video clip on Twitter containing an eerie sound emanating from the Perseus cluster of galaxies. The clip was originally posted in May but it gained more attention when it was reposted last week on the agency’s Twitter account for its exoplanet programs.

Many netizens were in awe of the peculiar sound but others pointed out that the celestial body sounded like “a billion souls being tortured,” according to Insider.

The agency explained that the black hole was first discovered in 2003 and has ever since been associated with sound.

“This is because astronomers discovered that pressure waves sent out by the black hole caused ripples in the cluster’s hot gas that could be translated into a note,” it wrote in the original May post.

NASA originally picked up data from the ripples using its Chandra X-ray Observatory but the actual sounds cannot be heard by the human ear.

To make them audible, they had to amplify the sounds 144 and 288 quadrillion times above their original frequency to get them from their true pitch to something that can be heard.

The results, however, were something akin to “cosmic horror,” as another Twitter user quipped.

Our Beloved Griffith Observatory

By Soumya KarlamanglaCalifornia Today, Writer
It’s Wednesday. Roughly seven million people have looked through the main telescope at Griffith Observatory. Plus, Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill for supervised drug-injection sites.
The Zeiss refracting telescope at Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles.Gabriella Angotti-Jones for The New York Times
LOS ANGELES — Atop a hill that offers views of glittering freeways and golden mountains is one of this city’s most popular attractions, drawing tourists who spend hours waiting in line to gaze upon it.
The must-see isn’t a collection of Hollywood memorabilia or a dazzling museum installation, but a telescope that has been operating in the Los Angeles hills for almost nine decades.
The 12-inch Zeiss refracting telescope is arguably the showpiece of Griffith Observatory, housed in the easternmost dome that forms the building’s crown-like outline. And like any proper Los Angeles icon, the telescope has its own claim to fame.
“More people have looked through that telescope than any other telescope else in the world,” E.C. Krupp, director of Griffith Observatory, told me.
To be clear, this is only a claim. There’s no “telescope sheriff” or other authority to officially bestow this title on the Zeiss, Krupp explains. But his evidence is difficult to dispute.
Tourists and locals enjoying the sunset at the Griffith Observatory, home to the Zeiss telescope.Gabriella Angotti-Jones for The New York Times
On a recent Los Angeles summer evening, tour buses unloaded crowds of visitors onto the lawn in front of a gleaming observatory. Couples took selfies with the Hollywood sign in the background, friends shared picnics and locals laid on the grass beside their dogs and bicycles.
Around 6:45 p.m., I climbed the stairs to the observatory’s roof to see the Zeiss. There was more than an hour till sundown and telescope viewing hadn’t begun yet, but already two dozen people were lined up.
Continue reading the main story
ADVERTISEMENT
Here we encounter the first piece of Krupp’s evidence: Griffith Observatory is extremely popular. It’s a major landmark in a metropolis that attracts millions of tourists from around the world each year.
The Zeiss telescope after viewing hours last month.Gabriella Angotti-Jones for The New York Times
The Zeiss isn’t a modern marvel like the new James Webb Space Telescope, but rather a 9,000-pound, German-made behemoth that’s been here since 1935, when Griffith first opened its doors. The observatory’s benefactor, Griffith J. Griffith, believed that the public, not just scientists, should be able to look at the stars.
Continue reading the main story
ADVERTISEMENT
“The real charm of the telescope is that people actually get to look through it, and that’s the fundamental principle of this place,” Krupp said. “We really intend to put people’s eyeballs to the universe.”
By 7 p.m., dozens more people had lined up behind me, and the growing queue was cordoned off as if we were at an amusement park. Around me were sunglasses, cameras, backpacks and a mélange of languages and accents.
“Is this the line?” asked a man wearing a Dodgers hat. He shook his head when he found out that it was.
By Krupp’s count, approximately seven million people have pressed their eye to the Zeiss telescope since it opened. He believes this figure, which comes from tallies kept by observatory staff who man the telescope, is almost definitely greater than that for any other telescope because:
Continue reading the main story
ADVERTISEMENT
Griffith Observatory is one of the oldest public observatories in the world, so the Zeiss has had more time to rack up views. And it’s free.Its fame has beget more fame. “The very fact that you have to wait in line creates its own sort of mystique,” Krupp said.Los Angeles’s weather means that the telescope operates for more days out of the year than one in, say, Berlin or Philadelphia. (A reminder to Angelenos be grateful for clear skies.)
Griffith Observatory
Krupp, who has been director of the observatory since 1974, told me that he began advertising the Zeiss as the most looked-through telescope in the world about two decades ago. He would be “surprised and disappointed” if someone proved him wrong, he said.
“We’ve been claiming that for a very long time, with the idea that if there were challengers wishing to take us down a notch or two, they’d do that,” Krupp said. “And they haven’t.”
When I made it to the front of the line, I entered through a low doorway into the dome that houses the telescope. The masked faces around me craned their necks to look at the metallic monstrosity.
I climbed a few steps to reach the telescope’s eyepiece, pointed at a star 25.3 light-years from Earth. A staff member grabbed a microphone to narrate the experience.
“More people have looked through it than any telescope in the world,” he boomed. “You join that illustrious history tonight.”
For more:
Krupp believes people are drawn to the Zeiss because it looks like a classic telescope, unlike the new James Webb Space Telescope, which he says more closely resembles “an alien creature.” Looks aside, the James Webb has captured some incredible images.The best telescopes for beginners.Griffith Park, Pershing Square — what’s behind Los Angeles park names? Read more from The Los Angeles Times.

The Growing Strategic Importance Of Private Satellite Companies

SkysatsHigh-resolution imaging satellites, like the Skysat series operated by Planet, have had a major effect on the war in Ukraine. (credit: Maxar)

War in Ukraine highlights the growing strategic importance of private satellite companies, especially in times of conflict

by Mariel Borowitz
Monday, August 22, 2022

Bookmark and Share

Satellites owned by private companies have played an unexpectedly important role in the war in Ukraine. For example, in early August 2022, images from the private satellite company Planet Labs showed that a recent attack on a Russian military base in Crimea caused more damage than Russia had suggested in public reports. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy highlighted the losses as evidence of Ukraine’s progress in the war.

Based on the strategic value commercial satellite imagery has held during this war, I believe it is likely that more nations will be investing in private satellite companies.

Soon after the war began, Ukraine requested data from private satellite companies around the world. By the end of April, Ukraine was getting imagery from US companies mere minutes after the data was collected.

My research focuses on international cooperation in satellite Earth observations, including the role of the private sector. While experts have long known that satellite imagery is useful during a conflict, the war in Ukraine has shown that commercial satellite data can make a decisive difference, informing both military planning as well as the public view of a war. Based on the strategic value commercial satellite imagery has held during this war, I believe it is likely that more nations will be investing in private satellite companies.

chart

Growth of the commercial satellite sector

Remote-sensing satellites circle the Earth collecting imagery, radio signals, and many other types of data. The technology was originally developed by governments for military reconnaissance, weather forecasting, and environmental monitoring. But over the past two decades, commercial activity in this area has grown rapidly, particularly in the US. The number of commercial Earth observation satellites has increased from 11 in 2006 to more than 500 in 2022, about 350 of which belong to US companies.

The earliest commercial satellite remote-sensing companies worked closely with the military from the beginning, but many of the newer entrants were not developed with national security applications in mind. Planet, the US-based company that has played a big role in the Ukrainian conflict, describes its customers as those in “agriculture, government, and commercial mapping,” and it hopes to expand to “insurance, commodities, and finance.” Spire, another US company, was originally focused on monitoring weather and tracking commercial maritime activity. However, when the US government set up pilot programs in 2016 to evaluate the value of data from these companies, many of the companies welcomed this new source of revenue.

Value of commercial data for national security

The US government has its own highly capable network of spy satellites, so partnerships with private companies may come as a surprise, but there are clear reasons the US government benefits from these arrangements.

First is the simple fact that purchasing commercial data allows the government to see more locations on the Earth more frequently. In some cases, data is now available quickly enough to enable real-time decision-making on the battlefield.

The second reason has to do with data sharing practices. Sharing data from spy satellites requires officials to go through a complex declassification process. It also risks revealing information about classified satellite capabilities. Neither of these is a concern with data from private companies. This aspect makes it easier for the military to share satellite informationwithin the US government as well as with US allies. This advantage has proved to be a key factor for the war in Ukraine.

Use of satellite data in Ukraine

Commercial satellite imagery has proved to be critical to this war in two ways. First, it’s a media tool that allows the public to watch as the war progresses in incredible detail, and second, it’s a source of important information that helps the Ukrainian military plan day-to-day operations.

Before the war, Ukrainian officials thought money was better spent on “down-to-earth” security needs, rather than expensive satellites. But now these officials view satellite imagery as critical.

Even before the war began in February 2022, the US government was actively encouraging commercial satellite companies to share their imagery and raise awareness of Russian activity. Commercial companies released images showing Russian troops amassing near the Ukrainian border, directly contradicting statements by Russia.

In early March 2022, Ukraine’s Vice Prime Minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, asked eight commercial satellite companies for access to their data. In his request, he said that this could be the first major war in which commercial satellite imagery played a significant role. Some companies obliged, and within the first two weeks of the conflict the Ukrainian government received data covering more than 40 million square kilometers of the war zone.

The US government significantly increased its purchases of imagery that could be provided to Ukraine. The US government has also actively fostered connections directly between US companies and Ukrainian intelligence analysts, helping promote the flow of information.

A recent example of the value of these images comes again from Planet. Over the past few weeks, the company has been releasing images showing the conflict drawing dangerously near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. In recent days, UN officials have said the situation poses a “very real risk of a nuclear disaster” and pushed for UN experts to be allowed to visit the site.

Before the war, Ukrainian officials thought money was better spent on “down-to-earth” security needs, rather than expensive satellites. But now these officials view satellite imagery as critical both to battlefield awareness and for documenting atrocities allegedly carried out by Russian troops.

Looking forward

Some space experts have called the war in Ukraine the first “commercial space war.” The conflict has clearly shown the national security value of commercial satellite imagery, the ability of commercial satellite images to promote transparency, and the importance of not only national space power, but also the space capabilities of allies.

The war in Ukraine may well prove to be a key turning point for both global transparency in conflict and the commercial Earth-observing sector as a whole.

I believe the fact that the US commercial sector had such a significant effect on military operations and public opinion will lead to increased government investment in the private satellite sector globally. Leaders in Ukraine intend to invest in domestic satellite imaging capabilities, and the US has expanded its commercial purchases. This expansion may raise new challenges if abundant satellite imagery is available to actors on both sides of a conflict in the future.

Some Earth-observing satellite companies have expressed hope that the lessons learned will extend beyond war and national security. The ability to rapidly produce images and analysis could be used to monitor agricultural trends or provide insight into illegal mining operations.

The war in Ukraine may well prove to be a key turning point for both global transparency in conflict and the commercial Earth-observing sector as a whole.


This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Mariel Borowitz is an Associate Professor in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at the Georgia Institute of Technology and director of the Nunn School Program on International Affairs, Science, and Technology. Her research deals with international space policy issues, focusing particularly on global developments related to remote sensing satellites and challenges to space security and sustainability.

A Portrait Of The Scientist As A Young Woman-Lindy Elkins-Tanton

book cover

Review: A Portrait of the Scientist as a Young Woman

by Jeff Foust
Monday, August 22, 2022

Bookmark and Share

A Portrait of the Scientist as a Young Woman: A Memoir
by Lindy Elkins-Tanton
William Morrow, 2022
hardcover, 272 pp., illus.
ISBN 978-0-06-308690-6
US$29.99

Had everything gone according to plan, Lindy Elkins-Tanton would be celebrating a launch this month. Elkins-Tanton is principal investigator for NASA’s Psyche spacecraft, a Discovery-class mission to the metallic main-belt asteroid of the same name. By early May, the spacecraft was at Cape Canaveral for final preparations for a launch on a Falcon Heavy scheduled for early August that would have the spacecraft arrive at Psyche in 2026.

“There aren’t many people who have led deep space missions and each of us followed our own path,” she writes. “But if there are a series of paths that have worked in the past, I can say with some certainty that I did not follow any of them.”

However, there were no celebrations and no launch, and Psyche the spacecraft remains in Florida. NASA announced in May that it was postponing the launch to a backup launch window in the fall, then in June postponed the launch indefinitely. Issues with a testbed—a mix of hardware and software from JPL and satellite manufacturer Maxar—delayed testing of key spacecraft software to the point where NASA concluded it would not be ready in time for a launch this year. An independent panel is reviewing the issue as NASA looks for new launch opportunities as soon as the middle of 2023.

Few people, though, may be better equipped to deal with a setback like that than Elkins-Tanton. As she describes in her recent memoir, A Portrait of the Scientist as a Young Woman, her life and career has seen much bigger twists and turns than a delay in a spacecraft launch. “There aren’t many people who have led deep space missions and each of us followed our own path,” she writes early in the book. “But if there are a series of paths that have worked in the past, I can say with some certainty that I did not follow any of them.”

Her path started conventionally enough: going to MIT and getting BS and MS degrees in geological sciences. It then diverged quickly: leaving academia to work in consulting, getting married, having a child, and getting divorced. Only later does her career path start to again resemble a more typical one, with a return to grad school for a PhD and then various positions in academia, including her current one at Arizona State University.

She offers an unvarnished look at the personal and professional challenges in her life, from family relationships to securing jobs in academia, a reminder that life is not a tale of monotonic progress. She lingers on some aspects, like the series of field expeditions to Siberia, looking for rocks that would provide clues to a massive volcanic event 250 million years ago linked to a major extinction, a series of trips that posed physical, cultural, and bureaucratic obstacles to overcome.

She describes elsewhere in the book the desire to get away from the “hero model” in academia and its equivalent in space, what she calls the “aerospace cavalry”: the team that rides to the rescue of struggling projects, pushes aside the original engineers, and “pull heroic wins out from seemingly certain losses.”

Elkins-Tanton also provides a fascinating glimpse into the work that goes into winning a competition for a NASA mission like Psyche. That work is more than just writing a proposal and waiting for NASA to select it: for major programs, like the Discovery line of planetary science missions, the agency selects a set of finalists who get funding for additional studies, but with it much more work to convince NASA. That includes months of preparation for what’s known as a “site visit,” where NASA officials come for extensive presentations about and questioning of the mission team. She provides perhaps the most detailed behind-the-scenes perspective yet of the planning for the site visit and the visit itself, as well as the call months later that NASA selected Psyche (along with Lucy, another asteroid mission) from the five finalists considered.

She describes elsewhere in the book the desire to get away from the “hero model” in academia and its equivalent in space, what she calls the “aerospace cavalry”: the team that rides to the rescue of struggling projects, pushes aside the original engineers, and “pull heroic wins out from seemingly certain losses.” Doing so, she argues, take a huge toll on both those who ride to the rescue and those who are rescued. “So I decided the goal was never to be the hero and never to have to call in the heroes,” she writes. “The goal was to do it better from the very beginning.” That view has certainly been challenged, at least, by the problems with Psyche.

Psyche’s future is still uncertain: at a NASA town hall meeting last week, agency officials said a “continuation/termination” review for the mission is tentatively scheduled for early November. As the name suggests, that leaves open the possibility NASA could cancel Psyche, although a more likely outcome is the mission will continue with a new launch date and some additional costs, one that will push back Psyche the spacecraft’s arrival at Psyche the asteroid to late this decade. It may be just another twist in the nontraditional, but ultimately fulfilling, path taken by Elkins-Tanton in her career and her life.


Jeff Foust (jeff@thespacereview.com) is the editor and publisher of The Space Review, and a senior staff writer with SpaceNews. He also operates the Spacetoday.net web site. Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone.

It’s Time FOr Artemis

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-1269114045029381&output=html&h=90&slotname=1048321172&adk=3735865468&adf=854766408&pi=t.ma~as.1048321172&w=728&lmt=1661273274&psa=1&format=728×90&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thespacereview.com%2Farticle%2F4439%2F1&wgl=1&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTAuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTA0LjAuNTExMi44MSIsW10sZmFsc2UsbnVsbCwiNjQiLFtbIkNocm9taXVtIiwiMTA0LjAuNTExMi44MSJdLFsiIE5vdCBBO0JyYW5kIiwiOTkuMC4wLjAiXSxbIkdvb2dsZSBDaHJvbWUiLCIxMDQuMC41MTEyLjgxIl1dLGZhbHNlXQ..&dt=1661273274619&bpp=4&bdt=206&idt=129&shv=r20220818&mjsv=m202208160101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Dde90da9ff1594ce8-22eeb0a2cdc90003%3AT%3D1627993183%3ART%3D1627993183%3AS%3DALNI_MYYmdr5IY0geY9zVwf4ZYL6c4ToRg&gpic=UID%3D000004356b74fbe2%3AT%3D1649173209%3ART%3D1660642869%3AS%3DALNI_MZZ3YDXXjchAR5_R1_WJ6H4YOPgGA&correlator=3628203059862&frm=20&pv=2&ga_vid=1913694711.1627993183&ga_sid=1661273275&ga_hid=439478647&ga_fc=1&u_tz=-420&u_his=1&u_h=1080&u_w=1920&u_ah=1040&u_aw=1920&u_cd=24&u_sd=1&dmc=8&adx=588&ady=126&biw=1903&bih=937&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44759876%2C44759927%2C44759837&oid=2&pvsid=2938062025733433&tmod=709567997&uas=0&nvt=1&eae=0&fc=640&brdim=1920%2C0%2C1920%2C0%2C1920%2C0%2C1920%2C1040%2C1920%2C937&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CeE%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=0&bc=31&ifi=1&uci=a!1&fsb=1&xpc=GBPa4pnYbp&p=https%3A//www.thespacereview.com&dtd=150

 SLSNASA’s Space Launch System and Orion spacecraft on the pad for the Artemis 1 launch, scheduled for the morning of August 29. (credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky)The time has finally come for Artemis 1by Jeff Foust
Monday, August 22, 2022
For more than a decade, the Space Launch System has been in something of a liminal state. It was a very real program, with real hardware being built and tested around the country, and consuming more than $2 billion a year for much of that time. But, as a rocket itself, it was still theoretical, years behind schedule and yet to even attempt to lift off. Until it rolled out to the pad for the first time in March, NASA could only offer illustrations of the rocket, in liveries that changed over the years, and animations of it blasting off from Launch Complex 39B.“We are in the final stretch,” Blackwell-Thompson said of Artemis 1 plans earlier this month.That may finally change next week. As soon as 8:33 am EDT on August 29, the first SLS is scheduled to lift off from LC-39B at the Kennedy Space Center with an uncrewed Orion spacecraft on top. That time marks the start of a two-hour window for the launch, with another two-hour opportunity starting at 12:48 pm EDT September 2. A third launch window opens September 5—Labor Day—at 5:12 pm EDT, for 90 minutes.As the months leading up to those Artemis 1 launch dates turned into weeks, agency officials have been increasingly confident that everything is, at long last, in place for a launch. That confidence came from a series of fueling and countdown tests called wet dress rehearsals: three in April and one in June that, while never getting to the planned stopping point, exercised the launch vehicle and ground systems enough for agency officials to conclude they were ready to finally move on to launch.That confidence was in evidence last week, when NASA moved up the rollout of the SLS from the Vehicle Assembly Building to LC-39B by more than 24 hours, having completed all the work they needed ahead of schedule and giving crews some additional margin at the pad to prepare SLS and Orion for launch.“We are in the final stretch,” Charlie Blackwell-Thompson, Artemis 1 launch director at KSC, said at a briefing earlier this month about the mission. As for an August 29 launch, “We are on plan for that at this time.”There have still been some issues to deal with in the final weeks. One of them is with the rocket’s flight termination system (FTS), which allows range safety to detonate the vehicle if it goes off course. The FTS system is installed in an intertank region of the SLS’s core stage, an area that can only be accessed while the rocket is in the VAB. Completing that work, including installing its batteries, was one of the last things done on the SLS before rollout.The problem is that the Space Force, which operates the Eastern Range, only certified the FTS for 20 days after its batteries are installed and tested, which takes place 15 days before the first launch attempt. That would have allowed NASA to proceed with launch opportunities on August 29 and September 2, but the clock would have run out before the September 5 launch. NASA managers said in briefings earlier in the month that they were working with the Space Force on extending that 20-day period for the FTS.On August 12, NASA announced it had received a waiver from the Space Force extending the lifetime of the FTS from 20 to 25 days, enough to enable a September 5 launch if needed.The FTS, though, could factor into future launch delays, though. If, for some combination of reasons, Artemis 1 does not launch by September 5, the vehicle will have to roll back to the VAB to refresh the FTS, since it cannot be accessed on the pad. Even if there was no other work needed to get SLS and Orion ready for another launch, agency officials said that the process of rolling back to the VAB and returning to the pad would make it difficult to launch in the next available opportunity, which opens September 20 and runs through October 4.“That would be a real challenge for us, to be honest with you,” said Cliff Lanham, senior vehicle operations manager in NASA’s Exploration Ground Systems program, of launching during that timeframe during a July briefing. “But we would certainly give it our best shot.”Artemis 1An overview of the Artemis 1 mission (larger version). (credit: NASA)Mission overviewFor all the attention that the launch itself is getting, far less is going to the overall Artemis 1 mission. That SLS launch only sets the stage for a test flight lasting up to 42 days that will put the Orion spacecraft through its paces and demonstrate that the spacecraft, under development in one form or another for more than 15 years, is finally ready to carry astronauts.The top objective of Artemis 1 won’t come until the end of the mission, when the spacecraft reenters at speeds of around 40,000 kilometers per hour. That will be the first test of Orion’s heat shield at those velocities.If the return powered flyby doesn’t work, LaBrode said, “then it’s a loss of the vehicle.”“It’s certainly very important that we accomplish that objective as part of Artemis 1 and really demonstrate what we know from our ground testing to be the capabilities of that heat shield,” said Howard Hu, NASA Orion program manager, at a briefing early this month.The mission’s second objective is to test all of the capabilities of SLS and Orion during the flight, including life support, propulsion, and communications, among others. “It’s really important that we have a good opportunity to test those systems together on Artemis 1,” Hu said.A third objective is to recover the Orion capsule itself after splashdown. Part of that is to test recovery operations for future crewed missions, as well as to return the capsule for analysis. That splashdown will take place about 100 kilometers off the coast of San Diego, California, with a naval vessel supporting the recovery effort. (One factor driving the timing of Artemis launch attempts is a requirement that splashdown take place during daylight.)Melissa Jones, NASA Artemis 1 recovery director, said at a briefing that the requirement for future Artemis missions is go from splashdown to having astronauts in the “med bay” on the recovery ship within two hours. “I think we can beat that pretty significantly: we’re looking at about 80 minutes,” she said.Orion will be on its way to the Moon quickly after liftoff. Orion and the SLS upper stage, the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS), separate from the core stage a little more than eight minutes after liftoff. Fifty-one minutes after liftoff, the ICPS fires for a brief burn to raise its orbit perigee.The big burn, translunar injection (TLI), comes about an hour and 37 minutes after liftoff, with the upper stage firing for 18 minutes to send Orion towards the Moon, with no margin for error. “The upper stage is pretty much a fire-and-forget vehicle,” said Judd Frieling, Artemis 1 ascent/entry flight director. “If it doesn’t perform the perigee raise maneuver or it doesn’t perform the TLI maneuver, Orion does not have the commodities to get to the Moon by itself. It has to be put on that TLI by that upper stage and it has to be at the times that we prescribe.”Orion will separate from ICPS shortly after that burn and head to the Moon. Five days later, it will pass about 100 kilometers from the lunar surface during a maneuver called the outbound powered flyby, using the main engine in its service module. That will set it up, four days later, to go into a distant retrograde orbit (DRO) around the Moon.Artemis 1 is the only mission of the Artemis program planned to use the DRO, once considered for the Asteroid Redirect Mission and Deep Space Gateway programs. Artemis 3 and later missions will instead go into the elliptical near-rectilinear halo orbit that allows for access to the lunar poles, while Artemis 2, the first crewed flight, will go on a free-return trajectory around the Moon.NASA says it’s using the DRO for Artemis 1 because it’s a very stable orbit. “It takes very little prop [propellant] to stay in that orbit,” said Debbie Korth, Orion program deputy manager at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. “We can do a very long mission where we can wring out the systems.”“If we can get the SLS off at the end of this month or early September, we hope that they’ll all have an opportunity to be able to fly,” Bleacher said of the ten cubesats on board.Orion will stay in the DRO for about two weeks, performing a burn to exit DRO 24 days into the mission. That will bring it back to the vicinity of the Moon 11 days later for the return powered flyby, which will put the spacecraft on course for the Earth, splashing down 42 days after liftoff.Those two close flybys, on the way out and back, are critical to the mission. “The margin for error is small,” said Rick LaBrode, lead Artemis 1 flight director. If the outbound powered flyby doesn’t take place as planned, Orion won’t make it to DRO. “We’ll still be able to bring Orion safely back, but we won’t be able to accomplish all of our mission objectives.”If the return powered flyby doesn’t work, he added, “then it’s a loss of the vehicle.”SLSSLS arrive at the pad last week for the Artemis 1 launch. (credit: NASA/Joel Kowsky)Other mission objectivesArtemis 1 has a fourth mission objective beyond reentry, testing of SLS and Orion systems, and recovering Orion after splashdown. The “additional flight test objectives” is a catch-all for a range of other tests on Orion during the mission, testing various spacecraft technologies from radiators to cameras mounted on the tips of its solar arrays.There are also payloads inside Orion that will be tested during the flight. Mannequins will measure the radiation environment that astronauts will be exposed to during a flight as well as the effectiveness of a vest to shield astronauts from that radiation. Lockheed Martin, working with Cisco WebEx and Amazon, will test the use of Amazon’s Alexa voice-based computing system inside Orion.Rob Chambers, director of commercial civil space strategy at Lockheed Martin, said in a briefing last week he expected to get a puzzled response from Amazon when contacting them about participating in the project, called Callisto. “Instead, they explained that one of the progenitors for Alexa, one of the thoughts that they had, if you will, was the voice computer from the Starship Enterprise,” he recalled. “In some ways, they said, they had been kind of waiting for this moment.”Artemis 1 will, in addition to Orion and its payloads inside, fly ten cubesat secondary payloads. The ten 6U cubesats, from NASA, international partners, and other organizations, will carry out a variety of missions, from orbiting and even landing on the Moon to testing deep-space communications technologies and using a solar sail to fly by an asteroid.That is, if the cubesats work. NASA required the cubesats to be delivered nearly a year ago so they could be installed on a payload adapter, on top of which Orion was attached. Once Orion was installed, those cubesats were inaccessible. While five of the cubesats had the ability to recharge their batteries, the other five, for various reasons, did not, raising concerns that by the time they launch, their batteries will be dead. Those cubesats have solar panels, but a lack of battery power could disrupt critical early operations after deployment from the SLS.“We’re trying to work through the preparations and get the SLS ready to fly. That’s the best thing we can do at this point,” said Jacob Bleacher, NASA chief exploration scientist, when asked about the battery issues with the cubesats at a briefing last week. “If we can get the SLS off at the end of this month or early September, we hope that they’ll all have an opportunity to be able to fly.”Craig Hardgrove, principal investigator for one of the cubesats, LunaH-Map, said the inability to charge that cubesat came out of prelaunch reviews. “The SLS program didn’t feel comfortable with us charging,” he said, but didn’t elaborate. Even if battery levels drop below the minimum needed to start its flight computer after deployment, he said two exposed solar arrays should generate enough power to charge the batteries “in not too much time.”Another cubesat identified by NASA as not being able to charge is Team Miles, which won its spot on the mission through the Centennial Challenges prize program. Wesley Faler, leader of Team Miles, said that was a deliberate choice. “We had an opportunity to charge but we opted out of it,” he said, based on the low rate of battery discharge. “We figured, why rock the boat and introduce the variable of recharging?”Planning for the futureAs NASA moves into the final stages of preparations for Artemis 1, it is also moving ahead on Artemis 2, the first crewed flight. That mission is likely to launch no earlier than late 2024, depending in part on the outcome of Artemis 1.“As long as you are healthy,” Wiseman said, “we’re going to load you on a rocket and shoot you off the planet.”NASA has yet to announce who will fly on the mission, although one of the four seats will go to a Canadian astronaut as part of an agreement between NASA and the Canadian Space Agency whereby Canada provides a robotic arm for the lunar Gateway. Canada, in return, gets a seat on Artemis 2 and a later Gateway mission.“The question everyone will ask is when are we assigning a crew to Artemis 2? We hope that will be later this year,” said Reid Wiseman, NASA chief astronaut, at a briefing earlier this month.In late 2020, NASA announced the selection of 18 astronauts as part of an “Artemis Team” that would be considered for future Artemis flight assignments. That announcement came at a National Space Council meeting where outgoing Vice President Mike Pence announced the 18 astronauts, calling them “heroes of the future.”However, Wiseman said that the entire astronaut corps of 42 active astronauts (with ten more in training) would be considered for Artemis 2 and later missions, not just the Artemis Team astronauts, a point he emphasized several times at that briefing.“The way I look at it, any one of our 42 active astronauts is eligible for an Artemis mission,” he said, a point he emphasized several times during the briefing. “We want to assemble the right team for this mission.”NASA, he also said, was changing radiation standards based on recommendations from a National Academies study last year, doing away with separate standards based on age and gender to a single one. Doing so, that study argued, would provide more flight opportunities for women who previously had a lower radiation standard.“As long as you are healthy,” he said, “we’re going to load you on a rocket and shoot you off the planet.” But first, Artemis 1 has to demonstrate that the rocket, and the spacecraft, are ready for astronauts.Jeff Foust (jeff@thespacereview.com) is the editor and publisher of The Space Review, and a senior staff writer with SpaceNews. He also operates the Spacetoday.net web site. Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone.

Review-A History Of Near Earth Objects Research

book cover

Review: A History of Near-Earth Objects Research

by Jeff Foust
Monday, August 15, 2022

Bookmark and Share

A History of Near-Earth Objects Research
by Erik M. Conway, Donald K. Yeomans, and Meg Rosenburg
NASA, 2022
ebook, 394 pp., illus.
free

Six weeks from today, Earth strikes back against the asteroids. At 7:14 pm EDT on September 26, NASA’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) spacecraft will collide with the small asteroid Dimorphos, which orbits a larger asteroid, Didymos. The impact will change the period of Dimorphos’ orbit as a test of one technique to deflect the trajectory of a potentially hazardous asteroid.

The book makes clear that the history of NEO research is a relatively recent one. The first major search for NEOs did not start until 1973, when NASA funded the Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey.

DART is the first NASA mission devoted to planetary defense: while the mission will perform some science, its primary purpose is to test the effectiveness of the “kinetic impactor” approach for deflecting asteroids. It’s a far cry from less than 15 years ago, when NASA was spending less than $4 million a year on a handful of projects to search for near Earth objects (NEOs), a change driven by both science and policy, as described in the new book A History of Near-Earth Objects Research from NASA’s history office.

The book makes clear that the history of NEO research is a relatively recent one. While the first asteroid was discovered in 1801, it was nearly a century before the first near Earth asteroid, 433 Eros, was discovered. For much of the 20th century, there was little focus on studying NEOs. The first major search for NEOs did not start until 1973, when NASA funded the Palomar Planet-Crossing Asteroid Survey.

What changed in the latter decades of the 20th century to increase the rate of NEO discoveries was in part changes in technology: electronic CCDs cameras supplanted film, while computers made it easier to automate searches and detect asteroids in those electronic images. At the same time, there was a growing recognition of the threats that NEOs posed to the Earth as scientists came to understand the impact record on the Earth, from Meteor Crater in Arizona to Chicxulub in Mexico, the impact that killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Soon there were goals to discover NEOs at least one kilometer across and, in a 2005 NASA authorization act, those at least 140 meters across.

However, as is often the case for NASA programs, appropriations lagged authorizations. As late as 2009, NASA was spending less than $4 million a year on NEO search efforts. What changed that was not a new recognition of the asteroid threat but instead a change in space exploration policy: the end of the Constellation program and the Obama Administration’s intent to replace it with human missions to a near Earth asteroid, which morphed into the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM). While ARM never got very far, it did have the lasting effect of increasing the NEO budget at NASA by a factor of ten, to $40 million in 2014. NEO discoveries, which a decade ago were still under 1,000 a year, now routinely exceed 2,000 per year.

The authors argue that planetary defense is an applied science, or public service of sorts, not unlike meteorology, where few begrudge the government funding the National Weather Service.

NASA’s efforts also evolved from simply searching for NEOs to a broader “planetary defense” effort that included work to prepare for, or prevent, an impact. That includes the DART mission as well as coordination with other federal agencies. NASA now spends about $150 million a year on planetary defense, including for missions like DART as well as ongoing NEO searches.

Despite the scientific and policy success, planetary defense still has to battle for funding. NASA’s 2023 budget proposal sharply cut funding for the next planetary defense mission, a space telescope called NEO Surveyor, pushing back its planned 2026 by at least two years. Draft House and Senate spending bills would at least partially restore that funding, but not enough to avoid a delay in a mission that scientists say is essential to meeting the goal in the 2005 NASA authorization act.

A History of Near-Earth Objects Research is a thorough history of NEO studies, touching on science, technology, and policy aspects. It is also something of a defense of the field, which has sometimes been criticized for not being purely science. (One of the book’s authors, Don Yeomans, worked on NEO studies for many years at JPL.) The authors argue that planetary defense is an applied science, or public service of sorts, not unlike meteorology, where few begrudge the government funding the National Weather Service. If successful, DART could not only demonstrate a means of protecting the planet from impacts, but also protecting the planetary defense program’s budget.


Jeff Foust (jeff@thespacereview.com) is the editor and publisher of The Space Review, and a senior staff writer with SpaceNews. He also operates the Spacetoday.net web site. Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone.

Roe vs Wade In Outer Space

Roe v. Wade: the space case

by Vanessa Farsadaki
Monday, August 15, 2022

Bookmark and Share

Roe v. Wade was a landmark case that posited that it is a woman’s right to choose, as protected under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution. With the recent overturn of that legal precedent by the US Supreme Court, the entire country is considering the implications for this controversial issue. As an expert in space medicine and a future astronaut, I find myself asking similar questions regarding the implications of this change to the future of human spaceflight. How should the law evolve once we leave the boundaries of Earth? How will nations manage a woman’s right to choose or what can and cannot happen with a woman’s body when that person is living and working in space? And how should the ethics be shaped when this issue surfaces in relation to mission assurance for space flights?

The case of unplanned pregnancies in space has social, political, and ethical challenges to consider.

Consider this hypothetical vignette: Imagine you are traveling on a six-month flight to Mars. The mission is corporate-funded versus by NASA or another government agency. During this flight, a couple decide to forgo the pharmacological supplements prescribed by the medical doctors from Earth which, in theory, control both the urge for and outcome of intercourse. As a result of this decision and their union, the mission must now deal with a pregnancy in space.

This hypothetical situation raises a plethora of questions and issues for consideration.

  • Which rules, if any, guide what happens next, and whose decision is it?
  • Based on what we know of space flight to Mars, what are the implications for the fetus and the woman in this situation considering both allowing it to come to term or choosing to terminate it?
  • As a round trip to Mars is more than a year, what are the implications and further considerations if the birth is successful?

These are serious questions, and they are just the tip of the iceberg for conversation. The science tells us what we can expect from a fetus under these conditions. For example, studies with rodents performed on the International Space Station have shown that premature babies are more common in microgravity than on Earth, and thus most mothers may not be able to carry a child to full term. However, the science also shows that, should the child survive, their survival rate would be higher despite any premature births. Since the period of gestation is very important for the correct formation and function of all the parts of the body, a baby’s first breath is crucial. Thus, in this example, will the air composition wherever the baby’s born be sufficiently close to a baby’s first breath on Earth?

There are more concerns, such as solar flares. This phenomenon surges wave after wave of protons that can cause havoc in the human body. Astronauts today do their best to shield themselves from solar flares by closing themselves up into small spaces until the wave passes. Nevertheless, they still get exposed to the same amount of radiation, just a less harmful set of types of particles. How would such a set of particles influence the development of a baby? How would they influence the migration of neural cells?

The case of unplanned pregnancies in space has social, political, and ethical challenges to consider as well. If, for example, said pregnancy did happen with the gestation challenges highlighted by the research, who would decide whether to terminate or not? Is this a governmental issue? Would the advice of flight surgeons who have not lived or operated in space be sufficient to manage the pregnancy? Does the woman have a right to even choose based on the information available or based on the type of mission they are on? Clearly, this type of case would sound ethical alarms for many people on Earth. Religions, ethics, and politics will form a cacophony of opinions; whose voice will be making the final decision? To my knowledge, no religious text talks about humans born in space, so this is uncharted territory. In addition, state law does not extend into space. So if a woman is resident of a state that abolished the right to choose, but she is living and working “out of state” in a cislunar habitat, does that state have a precedent to enforce their will on her?

Whether nationally or commercially sponsored, the potential for pregnancy in space should be addressed. The potential complications for or against allowing fetal termination or full gestation are significant. Should terrestrial laws, preconceptions, or considerations weigh into a decision that exists beyond the atmosphere? To go further, should a birth actually happen successfully, what then?

  • Does the location have the ability to care for the child successfully?
  • What laws will govern child-care rights and privileges?
  • As a potential first generation “Homo-Spaciens”, what is that child’s nationality? That first birth certificate will more than likely be iconic. But seriously: Will that child ever be able to come to Earth and survive here?

Roe v. Wade is a decision that will have far-reaching implications for humanity going forward. While the debate continues here with terrestrial considerations, it will be very important for various communities to come together and discuss the broader implications for human space flight in the near future. Whether you are a politician, a scientist, a sociologist, or a space enthusiast, you have a voice in that conversation.


Dr. Vanessa Farsadaki is a thought leader advancing the discipline of space medicine. She is president and managing partner of Space Exploration Strategies LLC, and her deep experiences with radiation exposure and protection sciences have made her a sought-after advisor on high-end programs of note. A proud American citizen of Greek descent and a medical doctor, she seeks become Greece’s first-ever astronaut.

Note: we are using a new commenting system, which may require you to create a new account.

A Stunning Tribute To Lieutenant Uhura

 NicholsNichelle Nichols is shown in NASA’s Mission Control at the Johnson Space Center in March 1977. (credit: NASA)Chief communicator: How Star Trek’s Lieutenant Uhura helped NASAby Glen E. Swanson
Monday, August 15, 2022
With the recent death of Nichelle Nichols, the number of surviving principal cast members of Gene Roddenberry’s original Star Trek television series shrank again. There now remain only three regular crew members of the Starship Enterprise: Ensign Chekov (Walter Koenig), Lieutenant Sulu (George Takei) and Captain Kirk (William Shatner) to help remind us of the pioneering television series that originally aired on NBC from 1966 to 1969.Nichelle Nichols’ down-to-earth work with NASA is often overshadowed by her role on Star Trek. This essay attempts to focus not so much on Nichols’ television role but on her work with NASA and the larger space community that she later associated with after leaving the series in 1969. This article will show that Nichols was not just a celebrity doing celebrity things but was also employed as a contractor by NASA to help with the space agency’s goal of bringing more attention to itself along with more diversity to its workforce.Star Trek broke new ground in many areas, not the least of which was having a diversity of both human (and alien) races serving as lead characters during a time when television audiences were not accustomed to seeing a serious science fiction series, especially one depicting a strong Black female.NicholsPublicity photo of Nichelle Nichols and William Shatner. (credit: Paramount/CBS)Outfitted in a bright red miniskirt uniform during a time when black and white TVs were being phased out by color sets (at the time of Star Trek, NBC was owned by RCA, a leading color television manufacturer, and advertising for the network often featured RCA sets), Nichelle Nichols’ character of Lieutenant Uhura stood out not only because she was Black but also because showrunner Gene Rodenberry believed that various races and ethnicities would be well represented in the future. Her workstation aboard the ship’s bridge was located close to the Captain’s chair and next to the ship’s second-in-command, the pointed-eared half-human, half-Vulcan Mr. Spock. The talented actress was regularly shown on screen during many of the show’s deciding moments. But even though she was seen as the ship’s chief communications officer, she was often not heard, a fact that did not go unnoticed by the actress herself.All the other characters in the show except Kirk, Spock, and McCoy, tended to be viewed as movable furniture. Nichols openly expressed frustration about her place in Star Trek, as her role was mostly limited to saying just three words “hailing frequencies open.” She told one interviewer, “She’s the chief communication officer and she can’t talk? What good is she?”[1]After listening to NASA’s Jesco von Puttkamer, Nichols began thinking about spaceflight—not the spaceflight of the 23rd century, but that of her own timeEven though she played a fictional character from a future where, presumably, people have moved beyond bigotry and racism, she had to live during a time when all of that was still very much real. Nichols told an interviewer, “The thing in 1966 was that everyone was scared to death of having a Black and a woman in an equal role. They [NBC executives] had just gotten through having a battle with Gene Roddenberry over Majel Barrett [who played Number One in the original pilot and Nurse Chapel in the series] in a strong female role, and they were scared to death of the South.”[2] After viewing the show’s first pilot episode, “The Cage,” NBC told Roddenberry that he could not have both the pointed-eared Vulcan Mr. Spock and the ship’s second in command played by Majel Barrett. Roddenberry let go of Number One but insisted on keeping Mr. Spock. After NBC saw a second pilot episode, Roddenberry was given the green light to proceed, and the rest is television history.NicholsEbony January 1967NASA takes noticeIn the January 1967 issue of Ebony magazine, Nichols appeared in a cover story that both labeled the actress as the “most heavenly body in Star Trek” and declared her to be “the first Negro astronaut, a triumph of modern-day TV over modern-day NASA.”[3] Nichols became a powerful advocate for the continued human exploration of space. She brought attention to the topic while at the same time speaking about her role as Uhura at Star Trek conventions. These events drew thousands of fans many of whom were initially too young to watch Star Trek during its original airing in the 1960s, but who became devoted followers of the show while watching the show in syndication.It was during one of these conventions, in her hometown of Chicago in 1975, where she along with over 30,000 attendees heard a talk by Jesco von Puttkamer, a NASA scientist and engineer. After listening to Puttkamer, Nichols began thinking about spaceflight—not the spaceflight of the 23rd century, but that of her own time. “I sat through Dr. von Puttkamer’s presentation in awe. I admit that until then I had not been fully aware of exactly what our national space program was about. Listening to Dr. von Puttkamer was a revelation to me. He put the space program in perspective and opened my eyes to its purpose and promise.”[4]NicholsThe rollout of the first Space Shuttle OV-101 Enterprise occurred on September 17, 1976 at Rockwell International’s Palmdale, California, facility. As the orbiter emerged from the hangar, the Air Force Band of the Golden West from March Air Force Base in Riverside, California, played Alexander Courage’s main theme to Star Trek. Shown left to right is NASA Administrator James Fletcher along with Star Trek principal cast members DeForest Kelley, George Takei, Nichelle Nichols, Leonard Nimoy and series creator Gene Roddenberry. Carl Sagan, famed astronomer and creator of the PBS series Cosmos, can also be seen between Fletcher’s and Kelley’s shoulders. (credit: NASA)While touring various NASA field centers, colleges and universities, Nichols’ appearances became more focused on space advocacy. On July 20, 1976, she was invited to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to witness the landing of the first Viking mission to Mars and, in September, she, along with most of the cast from the original television series, attended the Palmdale, California, rollout of the first space shuttle orbiter. President Ford had named the world’s first reusable spacecraft Enterprise, which many Star Trek fans supported by engaging in an earlier letter writing campaign that encouraged the President to change it to that from Constitution.NicholsNichelle Nichols and Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California in July 1976 during the Viking 1 landing on Mars. (credit: Don Davis)Because of her growing popularity as a space popularizer, in 1976 Nichols, along with Shirley Bryant Keith, Shannon O’Brien and Janet Holbrook, formed a company called “Women in Motion.”[5] The stated purpose of the company was “to produce educational and motivational films for minority youth; to encourage them to consider careers in the fields of engineering and science and to prepare them for the rapidly developing technology of the future.”[6]In January 1977, Nichols was elected to the board of directors of the newly formed National Space Institute (which later became the National Space Society), a civilian space advocacy group founded by famed rocket pioneer Wernher von Braun. Shortly after being elected, Nichols gave a speech to the NSI council meeting in Washington titled “New Opportunities for the Humanization of Space.” In her speech she challenged “NASA and everyone else involved in the space program to answer the question I’d heard a thousand times in my travels: ‘Space? So what’s in it for me?’”[7] Those in attendance during her speech included Dr. James Fletcher, the administrator of NASA.In her speech she challenged “NASA and everyone else involved in the space program to answer the question I’d heard a thousand times in my travels: ‘Space? So what’s in it for me?’”Fletcher was impressed by what he heard in Nichols. At the time, NASA sought to recruit more engineers and astronauts into its new Space Shuttle program and to attract more women and racial minorities. In addition, NASA introduced two new categories of astronauts—mission specialist and payload specialist—who would be researchers first and pilots second. The space agency’s requirement that all astronauts have military test pilot experience was dropped in the mid 1960s, thereby allowing the first group of scientist-astronauts to be chosen in 1965. This group of six scientist-astronauts made up NASA’s Group 4 batch of astronauts. Now, 12 years later, NASA wanted women to apply to become astronauts in the new Group 8 selection.By February 1977, after eight months of promoting the program, NASA received 1,500 astronaut applications and of those submitted approximately 30 were identifiable as minorities and 75 identifiable as women. With the deadline for applicants to file for the next astronaut group closing on June 30 of that same year, NASA was looking to further expand its selection pool. Nichols wrote that NASA was “perceiving a necessity for the human development of minorities in mathematics, science and engineering and the need for the encouragement of the broad participation of minorities and women in the space program.”[8] As a result, NASA awarded contract NASW-3049 to her Women in Motion Production Company specifically, “to embark on a review of NASA recruitment activities and a concerted effort to inform minorities and women of the opportunities available in the program and to encourage their active participation.” The $49,900 contract began on February 10 and ended six months later on August 10, 1977.[9]NicholsIn March 1977 one of the first stops by Nichelle Nichols as part of her new NASA contract was at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas. There she toured the facilities and met with astronauts including Alan Bean, the fourth man to walk on the Moon. (credit: NASA)Warp speed aheadWith the ink barely dried on her new NASA contract, one of the first stops that Nichols made was to Houston, Texas, where NASA’s astronauts lived and worked. There she met with various officials and astronauts at NASA’s Johnson Space Center to talk about her recruitment campaign. It was here that she met astronaut Alan Bean, who was the fourth man to walk on the surface of the Moon during Apollo 12. Bean met with Nichols in March 1977 and was her host during her visit, appearing with her in simulation and training exercises that were filmed on the space center’s grounds and made into a video to help Nichols recruit minorities and women to work for NASA and to apply in the astronaut program.Bean was also a talented painter who captured his space flight experiences on canvas. NASA chose Bean to work with Nichols not only because of his experience as an astronaut and moonwalker, but like Nichols, he was also an artist who most likely felt comfortable working with another talented artist like Nichols. Bean retired from the Navy in October 1975 but continued as head of the Astronaut Candidate Operations and Training Group within the Astronaut Office in a civilian capacity until his retirement from NASA in 1981.NicholsNichelle Nichols at the NASA Johnson Space Center in March 1977. (credit: NASA)During this same time at JSC, Nichols addressed more than 2,000 students from Texas junior and senior high schools that attend “NASA Symposium ’77” hosted at the Space Center. This was a first-of-its-kind event for NASA designed to motivate youth, especially female and minority students, to seek careers in engineering and science.[10]NicholsDuring her visit to the NASA Johnson Space Center Nichelle Nichols addressed more than 2,000 students from Texas junior and senior high schools who attend “NASA Symposium ’77” hosted by the Space Center. (credit: NASA)With contract in hand, Nichols left JSC to continue her cross-country public relations campaign for NASA. The final report that her company submitted at the close of the contract shows a very aggressive schedule. Even though the contract was for six months, the focus of her PR campaign was during a four-month period and it was grueling. Nichols cancelled all previous engagements and literally put her life on hold to engage in a cause that she felt was truly important.NicholsNichelle Nichols visiting the NASA Kennedy Space Center in 1977. (credit: NASA)“I went to every university that I could get to. I went to every woman’s organization, every professional science organization, the organization of Black engineers, I went to the Asian community, I went to the Spanish-American community, I went to the organization of Black pilots. Fortunately many of these people were having their annual conventions at that time. And many admitted that they allowed me to come because I was Uhura but they finished up because I was Nichelle Nichols speaking for our space program.”[11]NicholsNASA Dryden (now Armstrong) Center Director Isaac “Ike” Gillam with Nichelle Nichols in 1977. (credit: NASA)During the summer of 1977, Nichols traveled across the country, recruiting folks to come and work for NASA. Several weeks prior to the June 30 NASA astronaut application deadline, Nichols filmed a television segment for the popular ABC morning television news show Good Morning America. That segment aired on June 14 and showed Nichols on the campus of NASA’s Johnson Space Center talking about her work with shuttle astronaut Bill Pogue, who flew on Skylab 3. This major news network spot greatly increased interest among the public about what Nichols was doing and her efforts to recruit people to work for NASA.NicholsIn June 1977 Nichols visited the NASA Johnson Space Center to film a morning segment for the popular ABC program Good Morning America. There she spoke with astronaut Bill Pogue. (credit: ABC)In her report she found that the reason there were so few NASA applications from minorities and women was “because of open hostility, disbelief, gross misinformation and apathy toward NASA.”At the same time that Nichols was promoting NASA, the public was being swept away by the space spectacular known as Star Wars. Millions saw Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Obi Wan Kenobi, and Princess Leia do battle on the big screen that summer against the villainous Darth Vader. Nichols was courting that same audience, leveraging her own famous science fiction character in order to show how fans themselves could apply to actually work in space. The popularity of George Lucas’ film that summer did not hurt her efforts to engage the interest of the general public about possible careers with NASA.At the close of her contract, Nichols submitted a report. In her report she found that the reason there were so few NASA applications from minorities and women was “because of open hostility, disbelief, gross misinformation and apathy toward NASA.” There were a lot of “feelings of hurt among women who genuinely wanted to be astronauts, and among minorities, who felt heretofore left out if not deliberately excluded.”[12] Another of her observations resulted from several prior commitments that Nichols made outside of her NASA contractual obligations. These involved attending several NASA symposia and Star Trek conventions where Nichols wrote:“She [Nichelle Nichols] appeared before approximately 50,000 people at major science-fiction conventions such as those in San Francisco… Her public was at first dismayed as they had not perceived ‘their’ Lt. Uhura (Ms. Nichols character in the television series Star Trek) as becoming absorbed in real time space activities such as NASA’s efforts to recruit minorities and women. As Ms. Nichols’ extensive media coverage pervaded the country, she evolved a positive response from the public, and thus these occasions became opportunities. Questions directed to Ms. Nichols shifted from interest in her celebrity status as a fictional character to serious topics related to space exploration and space development, and her personal appearances now became anxiously awaited ‘Report to the fans’ on Ms. Nichols’ progress in recruiting minorities and women to participate in the real space exploration of today. Credibility, along with fervent commitment of NASA’s space program, became established fact.”[13]When Nichols spoke, she was sometimes confronted by claims that NASA was using her. She replied, “I know. And I’m using NASA too. But if you don’t apply, then they are right. If you qualify and you really wanted to [apply] and you don’t apply, they are right.”[14]By the end of June 1977, Nichols reported some 8,000 applicants were received by NASA’s astronaut office. Of this number she wrote, “1,649 were from women and over 1,000 were from minorities.” Among the applicants were Sally Ride, the first American woman to go into space; Fred Gregory and Guy Bluford, two of the first African-American astronauts, as well as three astronauts who later died in the 1986 Challenger accident: Judith Resnik, Ronald McNair, and Ellison Onizuka. Nichols efforts produced results that not only helped NASA diversify its overall workforce but also that of its new astronaut class of 1978. These “Thirty-Five New Guys” comprised “Selection Group 8,” the first new astronaut candidates to include Black people and women.[15,16]NicholsWhile principal filming for Star Trek: The Motion Picture was underway in early 1978, Uhura managed to sneak away from the set in her communications officer’s uniform to do a short film for the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum called Space: What’s In It for Me?. (credit: Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum)The adventure continues…Nichols involvement with NASA and the general space community did not end at the close of her contract. Because of the phenomenal success of Star Wars, Hollywood studios began dusting off their holdings to see how they could cash in on the new craze for science fiction films. Paramount Pictures held the rights to Star Trek and after several false starts, produced a major studio film that reunited Uhura with all of the major cast members from the original series for the very first time on the big screen. Although it did not gross as much as Star WarsStar Trek: The Motion Picture was a success at the box office when it premiered in December 1979.While principal filming for Star Trek: The Motion Picture was underway in early 1978, Uhura managed to sneak away from the set in her new communications officer’s uniform to do a short film for the Smithsonian. Dr. Kerry Joels, then director of education for the National Air and Space Museum, suggested that Nichols create a short orientation film to try and attract young people, especially girls, minorities and the underserved, to the new museum building that had opened on the National Mall just two years earlier. Nichols’ Women in Motion took on the task and filmed a group of non-professional kids from DC area schools who were depicted as an English class undertaking a field trip to the museum. Among them was a little girl named Lishia. In the story depicted by the film, the teacher, who was played by a real-life teacher, had given each student a different assignment and Lishia’s task was to distinguish the differences between space fact and space fantasy. When Lishia encounters the original 11-foot production model Enterprise that was used in the filming of the original series, Uhura beams down to the museum. Lishia acts as a docent, guiding Uhura through the museum while they talk about space. Uhura sings a song called “Reach for Your Star,” one of two songs that she and her husband Jim wrote for the film. Uhura soon realizes that the rest of the class will be coming so she quickly asks Scotty to beam her back. After doing so, all that is left of Uhura for Lishia are the memories of the event and Uhura’s earpiece left on the floor. As Lishia holds the small earpiece she hears Uhura singing “Remember, Lishia, always reach for your star…” The 20-minute film called Space: What’s in It for Me? was shown at the Air and Space Museum for a year.[17] Recently, NASM posted select portions from that film.NicholsMovie poster for the 2019 Nichols documentary Woman in Motion. (credit: Stars North Film)Woman in motionIn 2019, a documentary called Woman in Motion came out about the life of Nichelle Nichols. Produced and directed by Todd Thompson, the film succeeds in portraying the extensive career of an actress that most of us know for her pioneering role as Lieutenant Uhura in Star Trek. The film also uses material obtained from the NASA Headquarters History Office, specifically the executive report titled “Women in Motion” that summarizes the work Nichols’ did while under contract with NASA in 1977.In spite of a stroke she suffered in 2015, Nichols manages to remain a vivid on-screen presence in Thompson’s film. Viewers see an intelligent and talented individual who, even though touched by the debilitating effects of dementia, still impresses the viewer.The bulk of the production is comprised of film clips and interviews that tell the story of her life. Footage is used from an earlier documentary called Black Stars in Orbit that was directed by William Miles. His hour-long program was first broadcast on PBS in February 1990 and touches upon the racist policies that initially prevented Black pilots from participating in the space program as well as celebrating the accomplishments of those who finally did become astronauts. The full-length 52-minute interview that Miles conducted with Nichols for Black Stars in Orbit is available online through Washington University in St. Louis.NicholsNichelle Nichols interview from Black Stars in Orbit, the 1990 documentary directed by William Miles. (credit: Washington University in St. Louis)In spite of a stroke she suffered in 2015, Nichols manages to remain a vivid on-screen presence in Thompson’s film. Viewers see an intelligent and talented individual who, even though touched by the debilitating effects of dementia, still impresses the viewer. Nichols’ words are carefully chosen and viewers can sense her frustration with the changes she has undergone. The audience gets used to the tempered rhythm of her speech and are rewarded by the prevailing power of her voice complimented by the intense fire that is still present in her eyes.Thompson’s film chronicles the amazing and diverse talents that Nichols had as a musical theater actor. Growing up in Chicago, one of six children, Nichols first performed in nightclubs and live stage productions including Broadway where she exhibited a skill as an accomplished singer and dancer. When she moved to Los Angeles, she began to act in television. She first met Gene Roddenberry when she appeared in a controversial episode of his short-lived TV series The Lieutenant (1963–1964).Colin O’Malley provides the documentary film with a score that is powerful but sometimes too melodramatic for the numerous snippets taken from her book-on-tape, archival interviews, graphics and testimonials. The quality and number of diverse interviews that Thompson was able to obtain are notable, including those with Astronomer Neil deGrasse Tyson and Nichols’ Star Trek series co-stars George Takei and Walter Koenig. Leading civil rights figures, including Dr. King’s son Rev. Martin Luther King III as well as Rev. Al Sharpton and Congresswoman Maxine Waters, are also featured. NASA astronauts Fred Gregory, Guy Bluford, and Bill Nelson (now the NASA administrator) are interviewed along with astronaut and former NASA administrator Charlie Bolden.Although it is just over 90 minutes in length, Thompson’s film could have been shorter. The first hour clips along pretty well but then the film features several dramatic false endings where the viewer thinks the film is winding down only to discover that it is not.In addition, there are factual errors. For example, near the end of the film, viewers see posted on the screen “NASA was so impressed with her results, they increased the 1978 astronaut class roster from 25 to 35.” Although NASA may have been impressed by Nichols’ work, the space agency did not raise but rather lowered the final number of astronauts selected. Space historian and author Michael Cassutt, in the biography The Astronaut Maker about George Abbey, the director of flight crew operations at the NASA Johnson Space Center and in charge of astronaut selection during Nichols’ contract, points out during that time, “forty new astronauts would be selected, twenty pilot and twenty mission specialists.” [18] However, there were still astronauts left over from the Apollo/Skylab programs and most of those were pilots. As a result, NASA reduced that number by 5 resulting in the final 35 selected for the 1978 Group 8 Astronaut Candidate class or “ASCANs.”Viewers watching the film through to the end will be treated to Nichols shown in a recording studio singing “Fly Me to the Moon” while the end credits roll by. The power of her voice during this session is incredible. According to director Thompson, “Nichelle previously recorded ‘Fly Me to the Moon’ on her birthday a few years back so that track was our original source. But then she sang it live for us in the studio as well during filming.”[19]NicholsNASA Public Service Award presented to Nichols on October 7, 1984 by astronaut Judy Resnik. (credit: Todd Thompson and Woman in Motion)“Hailing frequencies closed”Star Trek was an exception among the all-white television shows that dominated the networks of the 1960s. In spite of the fact that the show featured principal cast members of unconventional racial backgrounds, Roddenberry didn’t know what to do with women. For a supposedly very progressive show, it still had some very conservative leanings. There were still no women starship captains.The Civil Rights Act of 1964, followed by the Equal Employment Opportunities Act of 1972, showed that the workplace in America was being transformed by the social activism of the time. More rights for African Americans were among the results and, by the time of the airing of the first episode of Star Trek on September 8, 1966, NASA already had in place policies against discrimination that included not only race and gender, but also physical handicaps.NicholsPhoto showing Nichols with NASA engineer Dr. Jesco von Puttkamer and shuttle astronaut Judith Resnik. (credit: Todd Thompson and Woman in Motion)Margaret A. Weitekamp, curator of Social and Cultural Dimensions of the Spaceflight Collection at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, writes, “The astronaut corps recruited by the NASA in the late 1970s owed at least part of its racial and gender diversity to Nichols and her fame as Lt. Uhura. The evolution of the Uhura character both reflected—and spurred—historical changes for women and people of color in postwar America.”[20]While Nichols acknowledges that “the precise reasons for the significant increase [in NASA astronaut office applications] cannot be wholly attributed to the specific efforts of this contract,” one cannot rule out her work over a relatively short period of time motivating others to at least take notice of what NASA was doing and to perhaps consider working for them.Nichols’ contract with NASA resulted in altering perceptions within the space agency not only changing how NASA hired people, but also how it chose them for its astronaut corps. Mae Jemison, the first African-American woman astronaut and Judith Resnik, NASA’s first Jewish-American astronaut, both attributed their space careers to Nichols’ recruitment efforts. Before her untimely death in the Challenger accident in 1986, Resnik presented Nichols with NASA’s Public Service Award. In a tribute to Nichols’ influence, Jemison appeared as a transporter operator in a 1993 episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation.NicholsOne of the many fan letters that Nichols received during her career. (credit: Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Headquarters History Office)While Nichols acknowledges that “the precise reasons for the significant increase [in NASA astronaut office applications] cannot be wholly attributed to the specific efforts of this contract,”[21] one cannot rule out her work over a relatively short period of time motivating others to at least take notice of what NASA was doing and to perhaps consider working for them. In the executive summary of her contract report she wrote that “perhaps our efforts, or push towards a racially, culturally and mixed space program are not ours at all, but merely the pull of the ethically balanced Star Trek Universe that lies in our future.”On the final page of that her report, Nichols wrote:WOMEN IN MOTION, INC. TO NASA HEADQUARTERS… THE MELODY LINGERS ON… WE STILL GET LETTERS… TELEPHONE CALLS… INTERNATIONAL NEWS AND PRESS COVERAGE… REQUESTS TO APPEAR, TO SPEAK ON NASA CONTRACT AT ORGANIZATIONS AND SCHOOLS, CHURCHES OTHER RELATED INQUIRIES… THE NASA BEAT GOES ON…PPS ENTIRE CREW RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS SHORE LEAVE…Thanks to Nichols work, Americans have come to expect greater diversity from NASA even though it took until 2022, the year that Nichelle Nichols died, for the first Black woman astronaut, Jessica Watkins, to be part of a crew aboard the International Space Station. It is hoped that in the coming years ahead, even greater efforts by the space agency will bring equity, like that envisioned by Star Trek, that much closer to reality.NicholsNichelle Nichols speaks in front of the Space Shuttle Endeavour in Los Angeles on September 21, 2012. (credit: Reed Saxon/Associated Press.)ReferencesWoman in Motion, directed by Todd Thompson (A Stars North Film, 2019)Allan Asherman, June 9, 1987 Interview by Allan Asherman, The Star Trek Interview Book, (New York: Pocket Books, 1988), p. 69.Ebony, January 1967, pp. 70-76.Nichelle Nichols, Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, (New York: G.P. Putham’s Sons, 1994), p. 209.Nichelle Nichols, Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, (New York: G.P. Putham’s Sons, 1994), p. 222.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Nichelle Nichols, Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, (New York: G.P. Putham’s Sons, 1994), p. 219.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.“Symposium ’77 to draw 2,000 students,” NASA Roundup, Vol. 16, No. 4, February 18, 1977, p. 1.Woman in Motion, directed by Todd Thompson (A Stars North Film, 2019). Nichelle Nichols is speaking from an interview done on March 16, 1989 for the documentary Black Stars in Orbit.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Nichols interview by Margaret A. Weitekamp, May 24, 2022, “More Than “Just Uhura:” Understanding Star Trek’s Lt. Uhura, Civil Rights, and Space History”, p. 17 Star Trek and History, Wiley Pop Culture and History Series, edited by Nancy Reagin, pp. 22-38. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Nichelle Nichols, Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, (New York: G.P. Putham’s Sons, 1994), p. 225.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Nichelle Nichols, Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and Other Memories, (New York: G.P. Putham’s Sons, 1994), pp. 229-230.Michael Cassutt, The Astronaut Maker: How One Mysterious Engineer Ran Human Spaceflight for a Generation, (Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 2018), p. 175.Todd Thompson, email exchange with author, January 8, 2022.Weitekamp, Margaret A., “More Than Just Uhura”: Understanding Star Trek’s Lt. Uhura, Civil Rights, and History.” In Star Trek and History, edited by Nancy R. Reagin, pp. 22-38. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Women in Motion, Incorporated, NASA Contract NASW-3049, “Final Report by Women in Motion, Inc.,” August 10, 1977, NASA Astronaut Recruitment (Nichelle Nichols) Report file, 8935, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA Headquarters History Office, Washington, DC.Glen E. Swanson is the former historian of the NASA Johnson Space Center and founder of Quest: The History of Spaceflight Quarterly. Glen is currently working on a book on how scientifically knowledgeable agencies and organizations like NASA and the aerospace industry guided the creation of popular fiction and influenced the Hollywood of the 1960s with a special emphasis on the original Star Trek television series. If anyone knows of a good publisher or agent, he can be reached at glenswanson@cspace.siteNote: we are using a new commenting system, which may require you to create a new account.

Robert Heinlein-“The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress!”

A Harsh Mistress

Scientists recently discovered that Earth’s satellite is not entirely inhospitable, saying there are spots on the moon that are “very cozy,” the Atlantic reported.

A research team recently analyzed data from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter of two lunar caverns located in the Sea of Tranquility in the Moon’s northern hemisphere.

Their findings showed that one of these cylindrical-shaped caverns had a pleasant, cool temperature of 63 degrees Fahrenheit that didn’t change much from a lunar day to night.

A lunar day lasts about a month on Earth, which means that the Moon’s surface experiences about 15 days of nonstop, scorching sunlight that can boil water. The lunar night, meanwhile, is a period of intense cold.

Lead author Tyler Horvath explained that sunlight illuminates only a part of the 328-feet-deep cavern, while the rest is permanently in the shade. This prevents it from heating up too much and stops the warmth from escaping at night.

But Horvath’s team noted that this cavern also had a small dent in the wall, which they believe to be the entrance to an underground cave.

They added that these structures were created during the Moon’s formation billions of years ago and could be the perfect spots for future lunar colonists to build permanent homes on the celestial body.

Earth’s satellite has no atmosphere, lacks defenses against dangerous cosmic radiation and is occasionally bombarded by small meteorites.

Science fiction writer Robert Heinlein had a point when he titled his book, “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.”

Galactic Needle

DISCOVERIES

Galactic Needle

An international research team found evidence of the first-ever dormant black hole located outside the Milky Way galaxy, Sky News reported.

They explained in their study that the peculiar black hole was born from a star that disappeared without any sign of a powerful explosion. Usually, stellar-mass black holes form when massive stars die and collapse under their own gravity, hence one found in the absence of any trace of an explosion is like “a needle in a haystack,” researchers said.

Named VFTS 243, the rare black hole is located in the Tarantula Nebula, part of the Large Magellanic Cloud, our nearest galactic neighbor.

It is at least nine times the mass of our Sun and orbits around a hot, blue star weighing 25 times the Sun’s mass, which makes it part of a binary system, the researchers explained.

Unlike the usual suspects, dormant black holes do not emit high levels of X-ray radiation, which is normally how they are detected.

“It is incredible that we hardly know of any dormant black holes, given how common astronomers believe them to be,” commented co-author Pablo Marchant.

The study was conducted by a group of astronomers called the “black hole police,” known for constantly debunking new discoveries of gravitational singularities.

“For the first time, our team got together to report on a black hole discovery, instead of rejecting one,” said lead author Tomer Shenar.

Shenar and his team said the find has “enormous implications for the origin of black hole mergers in the cosmos.”

They hope it will help other astronomers discover similar stellar-mass black holes orbiting massive stars: They believe thousands exist both in our galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds.